"Miss Kaley, why is the camel wearing a turban, and why is he riding a magic carpet?"
I grimaced a bit. Really? I am preparing this six-year-old for a life of musical pioneering, and this is the kind of question I have to answer in music lessons?
"I don't know, John. I think because this song is about a Persian market, and, well, apparently there are both turbans and camels in or around a Persian market." He looked confused. "And magic carpets do not exist."
"Why is there a magic carpet if they don’t exist? Why is this song Persian? What's Persian?"
Oy. Is there any way I can answer this question without encouraging him to eternally associate the complex, artistically magnificent, ancient culture of Persia with camels, turbans, and magic carpets? And how do I justify a displeasing tune with a flatted second that is both difficult for him to play and sounds like death on an equally tempered keyboard? Neither of these things are AT ALL like Persian music, and I’m sure that James Bastien didn’t intend for it to be authentic. So I struggle, because, I believe it’s a positive situation for the child to be asking about other cultures, but the music in the Bastien method that encourages these questions is so terribly written, simplistic, and offensively illustrated that it reminds of a 19th century child learning about African-American culture from any one of Eurocentric, misguided avenues. (I should mention that dumbed-down versions of racist Stephen Foster tunes, such as “Old Black Joe,” with extremely unpleasant, racially stereotyped drawings appear in the earlier editions of the Bastien method).
John fidgets, inventing some story about the camel and the magic carpet. I am selectively listening (as usual with six-year-olds). He asks again what Persian means. “Persia is a part of the middle east, now including Iran and Iraq. Persian music often uses scales and sounds that we don’t have on the piano, but in this song, the composer tried to make it sound Persian by adding a D-flat in C-position! What do you think of the sound?”
John
huffs. “I think it sounds BAD!”
Well,
there you have it. It DOES sound bad. In fact, flatted seconds are no more a
characteristic of Persian music as they are of late Schoenberg; sure, they
appear, but they aren’t definitive. So what we have from Mr. Bastien is a lazy
musical forgery. See the piece below:
I
have witnessed many of my students struggle with pieces like this and others in
the Bastien method. Each student proclaimed wildly that the music sounded
terrible and they had no motivation to practice. Sadly, I’m sure if I played
little John a piece from one of my favorite albums, Faryad by the Masters of Persian Music, he would be enthralled at
the beauty and skill of the performers and their content; but, to play, he gets
nothing more than a dumbed-down, insensitive noodling around C-position with an
added “weird note.”
This
and similar events occurred about a year ago, and this was the time I pledged
to do away with all James Bastien materials, and move exclusively to my own
methods or the Piano Adventures method
by Nancy and Randall Faber, which I will defend in detail. Because children absorb their early
musical influences like a starving sponge, paralleling the path of language
acquisition. A child who is exposed to native Spanish speaking at an early age
may not retain fluency in the language, but will almost definitely retain the
ability to recall Spanish phrases and, most importantly, will retain a superior
accent. Music is the same: by exposing
our children to different musical languages at this young age, they will
exhibit more musical flexibility later on. It is important to expose children
to authentic musical content and not
forgery; and equally important to expose them to authentic musical context and
not arbitrary cartoons. This is essential for the future of our art, as we need
to train open-minded, genre-crossing composers and performers. Most teachers
today will defend this ideology – but they must be active with it, purchasing
method books or “going rogue” in a way that honors the idea. Method books are
much, much, much more influential than we expect. It is a child’s first
exposure to self-created musical expression and organization.
Let’s
examine some Bastien material in detail. In the Level 1 Piano book, there are
41 short pieces. Only one – “Fiesta” – exhibits an inkling of syncopation:
Problems
abounding; an anthropologist’s nightmare. We have the Spanish guitar dressed
like a Mexican Mariachi player, wearing a sombrero
and playing maracas. He is playing alongside a Spanish Flamenco dancer,
complete with skirt, shoes, and castanets. Immediately, some form of arbitrary,
lazy cultural grouping. Will this child ask about this picture? Most
definitely, because of its colors and prominence. The teacher then has the
responsibility to explain that Mexico and Spain are actually completely
different places with completely different musical cultures, but in this song,
they’ve been smushed together, presumably because they share a common language,
but most likely because James Bastien thought American students didn’t need to
distinguish one way or the other. (Lack of distinction between Latin Ameican
and Spanish culture is a lingering problem in American youth). Musical analysis
shows the use of triple meter and an unaccented downbeat, which can be common
to both styles; diatonic harmony with a prominent dominant seven, evoking the
Mariachi; and the flatted second (apparently Bastien’s preferred and only
method of evoking an alternate tonal system), which is typical to Flamenco
music in this case. Also typical to Flamenco is the ending exclamation “Ole!” The most unsettling thing,
however, is the conscious choice to illustrate the two styles at once in the
cartoon, showing a complete indifference on the part of the publishers as to
whether or not the child deserves accurate musical and cultural knowledge.
Similarly,
of the 41 pieces, only one utilizes non-diatonic harmony (“Morning Prelude,” an
exercise in smearing notes together with the pedal). I have taught from all
four levels of the Bastien books; each level contains the same pathetic ratio
of square rhythm to syncopation, diatonic harmony to modal.
I
say this not only for the sake of disparaging Bastien for a job poorly done,
but because Faber and Faber’s Piano
Adventures series is an infinitely better way of introducing children to
authentic sounds. There is no reason to choose Bastien over Faber in today’s
world, yet so many teachers do. This example from the Level 1 Piano Adventures: Performance book shows
an interesting modal melody with odd phrase lengths:
Not
only is the melody satisfying to play on its own, but, conscious of the need
for musical satisfaction in the young player, the Fabers have provided a
harmonically and rhythmically rich duet part for the teacher. In my experience,
duets at this young age are incredibly inspiring to young children; they begin
to learn essential “chamber music skillz” (my term for starting and finishing
together without counting), and are also treated to a satisfying aural
experience. Bastien offers no duets in any level. Further, this piece provides
an interesting and relevant fact at the top, putting this authentic melody in
historical and cultural context. Upon discussing this with the teacher, the
student now has an understanding that music is not just notes to be read, but
rather a vessel of cultural meaning.
Essentially,
I find the selection of proper method books incredibly important based on my
personal experiences as a young student and, now, as a teacher. Raised on Piano Adventures, I can recall vividly
the satisfaction of learning “Erie Canal,” “Summer Blues,” “Malaguena,” and
“Song of Kilimanjaro.” I credit my affinity for blues scales and Flamenco
rhythms entirely to the piano method books of my youth: I came from a completely
non-musical American family, and had no predetermined preference for certain
scales or rhythms. But thanks to my teacher’s chosen method, non-Western sounds
rest inside a deep part of my heart and my brain, cultivated from age three,
now ready to be expressed and interpreted in combination with my classical
training. The Fabers – trained composers and performers - have continually
expressed the importance of multi-cultural pedagogy, particularly after the
adoption of their Mandarin daughter, who is now the inspiration for several new pedagogical pieces utilizing Mandarin musical characteristics.
Since
this incident with young John and “Persian Market,” I have switched my entire
studio, regardless of level, over to Piano
Adventures. The results have blown my mind. I now have students learning
difficult pieces in two weeks; who practice daily, simply because they love
their new songs; and who beg to play duets over and over again for the
satisfaction of hearing a complete musical piece. They crave knowledge about
their music’s origins; I regularly assign research projects, which entail
looking up facts about their piece’s style and origins. Some of them even
compose now, overwhelmed with the rich musical vocabulary they’ve acquired.
This is a stark contrast from confused questions about weird cartoons,
unpleasant and misplaced accidentals, and struggling with practicing because
the pieces “just don’t sound right.” Bastien’s pieces are arbitrarily composed,
with no inherent musical meaning to encourage the child along a path to
expression. The typical American child sincerely comes from a musical melting
pot – they are hearing new languages, new ideas, new tunes every day. Musical inspiration can only come from
harnessing their inherent, beautiful, American affinity for multiculturalism. Take
advantage: choose Piano Adventures over
Bastien!
Oh, before I forget, here is a really, really, really racist piece in the Bastien book, Indian Life, which I think should be boycotted and taken off all websites and shelves:
20 comments:
You're a moron!
You're a moron!
Thank you for making people aware of this. I've been perturbed by the rampant racism by the pieces in piano recitals so thank you for raising awareness.
Interesting analysis. Thanks for this. I learned piano on the Bastien books through about level 3, then had another teacher who used Faber and Faber, which I loved. I know am teaching my first students and am using F&F. It's been great. He went through Primer and is now starting Level 1. There is no comparison between the two series. Faber and Faber, hands down!
While I certainly appreciate the Fabers, knew them personally, took two of my children to their studio, and have bought hundreds of their books for my students over the years, the Bastien books can't be beat for teaching young children in small groups. I have used them for my small groups of very young students for almost three decades and wouldn't trade the enjoyment they brought for anything in the world.
PS IRAQ IS NOT PERSIAN !!! Do your homework before you spout off such a reviling diatribe!!!
Lydia Soroosh (Persian)
While I certainly appreciate the Fabers, knew them personally, took two of my children to their studio, and have bought hundreds of their books for my students over the years, the Bastien books can't be beat for teaching young children in small groups. I have used them for my small groups of very young students for almost three decades and wouldn't trade the enjoyment they brought for anything in the world.
PS IRAQ IS NOT PERSIAN !!! Do your homework before you spout off such a reviling diatribe!!!
Lydia Soroosh (Persian)
I have been usig the bastien method for a few years. I don't complian, but yes, I have see some rare stuff. Thanks for your suggestion, I'll check them out.
I can't imagine any child being overwhelmingly interested in the accuracy of the drawings. For the most part that is mere caviling . A few little sketches brighten the pages of a primer and the Bastiens aren't afraid to print in color, which is nice.
However I do agree that the original compositions by the Bastiens are almost uniformly dreadful. I cannot believe that a professional would produce such poorly written music. And to encourage beginners to use these pieces is incomprehensible.
However included in the higher levels are nicely formatted and easy to read classics. If a teacher simply weeds out the Bastien works from the classics, the series can be used. "Intermediate Repertoire" is well laid out with a good proportion of easy classics. And has an added benefit of several "Theory" and "Technical" pages.
I think you're fretting too much about illustrations ... the real problem is a simple one ... it's the poor compositions by Bastien. Weed those out and you set to go.
I have a site which offers free downloads of easy neo-classical music. And it is good music written expressly for beginners with no trendy dissonance or irregular rhythms.
http://www.thehappypianomuse.wordpress.com
I have taught from several piano methods, and while the Fabers have some some interesting songs and emphasize tonic and dominant early on, my experience has been that the Faber method tends to dumb a student down. I had two sisters in the different methods, and the sister in the Bastien method beat the sister in the Faber method in sightreading and other concepts hands down. Students who I taught Alfred also read better, although the early Alfred books bore me to tears and I don't use them unless there is nothing else available. Alfred Masterworks is another story altogether; I like both the Bastien Classic-beyond-the-primer books and Alfred Masterworks, although I don't think Alfred has a single particular book to compare with Bastiens' Intermediate Book with Bach, Ellmenreich, and others.
I agree with Nikki Ty that you're fretting too much about illustrations, and am curious as to how Fiesta is supposed to be racist and lazy, as the characters look lively, not lazy.
I've taught out of Bastien, Faber, Alfred, APPC, and John Thompson. I have a BA in Music, and have been teaching piano, French Horn, and composition for several years. I am also a composer. My skill level as a composer is professional, as a hornist, a semi-pro or regional level pro player, and as a pianist, I am at an advanced level, and have accompanied other musicians here and there as well. I have other credentials, but this should give you a bit of an idea about my qualifications and level of expertise.
It doesn't really matter that much what method you choose for beginners. What matters is WHAT you are teaching them. Heck, I can fill in the weak links on any method myself. Intermediates and advanced students all need the standards, etudes, scales, etc. obviously. Whatever gets them there, works. I really focus on theory for beginners, then add in more and more technique, etc. as students get older. So what if the Bastien series has some corny or somewhat stereotypical illustrations? They are still great folks, and the intent was probably something quite a bit more light hearted than you took it. Nobody believes them to be anything but great folks, teachers, and great musicians.
Honestly, you should probably pay far more attention to the methods and materials used by students at more advanced levels, esp. IF they want to be professionals. I can clearly understand that kind of dialogue, without a doubt. Wow...
Have to agree with Chris Kaufman on this one!
First of all, I am not a musician. And English is not my native language as anyone can see.
A simple search on google brings me to this link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_scale#Harmonic_minor_scale which says this scale is used in middle-east music. How can you be teaching piano when you ignores the Persian Market is not C major but F minor? A flattered second? You are teasing us saying you teach piano.
Your pupil John, if he is real, must be a very sad child if he has to question why a camel flies in a carpet. Better his parents don't take him to the cinema.
Second, I am Spanish and only a weird person can see a problem in the Fiesta song. Are you using this book to teach other cultures to your pupils? Please forget about it and motivate them to learn piano.
I don't know the Faber's but Bastien is the book that teachers are using in music academy near my home (Madrid, Spain) and they prefer it over Faber beacause it does not tie the hand to the C position for so long.
I've been teaching piano for 18 years and have used Bastien, Alfred, and Faber. I have students in all three right now because when I get students from a different teacher I don't make them switch to my preferred method if their family already owns a particular series - but I'm considering it. I definitely see more success with Bastien than with Faber. My Faber students struggle more. I have yet to have a student in all these years worry about the artwork on the page .
I learned out of the Schaum series myself and it bored me to tears. I couldn't stand it. Fletcher? As beloved as she was, her series is also boring as heck and, in my opinion, introduces some concepts a bit too early on.
I do like Faber but my preferred series is Bastien's. Yes, some of the original compositions aren't very creative but they're typically very simple which I've found to be quite good for beginner students. I've found that those simpler songs are mastered quickly which increases confidence and makes the student want to continue on.
I think that at the end of the day the most important thing is HOW you're teaching each child. Different kids require different approaches to the learning process and it's up to us as teachers to recognize it and respond to it. I strongly believe in a child-led approach to music and it has worked for me for years. It's more about the attitude we have in teaching them than in the books we choose to use.
WITH RESPECT TO EVERYTHING THAT THIS PERSON WROTE
IT SEEMS TO ME AN ITEM OF BAD LIKE PROFESSIONAL AND IT WAS TOTALLY OF CONTEXT
THE IMPORTANT IS THE GREAT JOB THAT THE BASTIEN MADE TO PRESENT THE MUSIC TO THE BOYS OR TO ANYONE INTERESTED IN LEARNING MUSIC (BASTIEN BASICS)
THE ATTACK IS CONCENTRATED ON THE GRAPHICS OF THE BOOKS.
TOO MUCH ADVERTISING FOR ANOTHER MARKET METHOD AS FABER IS.
TO BE HONEST BOTH METHODS SEEM TO COMPETE ON THE MARKET
THERE ARE MANY METHODS IN THE MUSIC MARKET
THE BASTIEN DID A GREAT JOB
ALL BOOKS MUST BE USED CORRELATED (5 BOOKS PER LEVEL)
ACCORDING TO THE AVANZA STUDENT YOUR MUSICAL KNOWLEDGE WILL BE MOST INTERESTING (LEVELS 2 - 3 - 4)
THE BASTIEN ALSO HAVE AN EXCELLENT MATERIAL OF INTERMEDIATE LEVEL
EACH PERSON CHOOSES THE METHOD TO WORK
BUT THAT PERSON WHAT HE TRIED WAS ATTACKING A METHOD FOR THEN
SPEAK GOOD FROM ANOTHER
IN A VERY LITTLE PROFESSIONAL WAY
THE PEDAGOGICAL PRESENTATION
WHAT DOES BASTIEN OF ALL THE MUSICAL MATERIAL IS IN REALITY VERY GOOD
ORGANIZED
CLEANSED
IN SEQUENCE
PRESENTS THE CONCEPTS VERY WELL
STUDY IS REQUIRED AND A LOT OF PRACTICE ...
Agreed. :-)
I completely agree, and we seem to have similar approaches to teaching piano, in fact...
I'm glad I stumbled upon this blog post, as I've recently been grappling with the racist and politically incorrect illustrations and lyrics in the Bastien Books. Don't get me wrong, I've used the Bastien Primer and Level 1 books for the last 16 years of teaching because I do believe they are fabulous for getting students started. I've never used beyond Level 1, as that's when I usually transition students to RCM books. I've also used the F&F books and I think they're good as well.
I think it's important to raise awareness of things like this, and we can all choose to approach it however we want, in the end. I really wish they would do an updated version that renames and re-illustrates some of the songs though.
Thanks for writing this post. As I said already, it's important for people to raise awareness of issues of racism and political incorrectness, even when it wasn't originally intended. Society evolves, as it should, and so should these kinds of publications.
Post a Comment